yesterday morning, "Jiujiang bridge" case of Guangdong Province captain Yang Xiong countercharged owners Fokai Expressway Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the Buddha to open high-speed") case, a court in the Guangdong Provincial Higher People's Court of second instance. The appellant lawyers said, there is sufficient evidence to prove that the Jiujiang bridge due to its own security risks suddenly collapsed and hit a sinking the appellant belongs to the "Southern Guangxi machine 035" ship, and apply to the court, a salvage ship bow, and made no touch Cheap soccer jerseys country marks; two is to appellee obtaining relevant technical data Jiujiang bridge, including design drawings, design drawings, pier pier buried depth and so on; three of the original 24 Jiujiang bridge pier construction in compliance with design requirements for survey and identification. The appellee lawyers one one counter. Because of the complexity of the case, the court will be to continue the trial.
on the salvage ship
appellee lawyers think, no need to salvage ship bow. The reason is before cutting salvage ship, cheap jerseys for sale there are already two of businesses reported that the ship had injuries. In the criminal verdict "(2012) and a terminal panicle punishment No. 111st" (hereinafter referred to as "the criminal ruling"), has written "two detection report confirms the serious damage on the starboard side of the ship, the bow plate deformation (editor's note: the following called here as" injury points A ")"; in addition, the Fuyang star diving team diving felt report stated: "on the starboard side of the ship steel plate deformation of 2.5 meters wide", is obviously the ship hit the bridge pier.
Mr, Appellants appeal to "hurt the little A" are explained, and that it is because only this scar, it cannot prove the bows of the pier. First of all, explored the report no conclusive Cheap hats opinions that damaged ships is derived from the ship bridge collision, which also includes the "broken injury points A" site. Secondly, from the analysis report, overlooking the sunken ship, ship's starboard outer edge is complete, only because the bridge fell down the damages caused to the wreck, "injury; A" located on the starboard side of the ship near the bottom side ribs, broken at the width of 2.5 meters, extrusion deformation damage shape is from top to bottom, vertical the direction of the horizontal deformation, rather than the impact of the "injury, and A" is just a big bridge on the Inexpensive jerseys ship. Therefore, can be derived from "broken injury points A" is caused by extrusion deformation of ship bridge, and not touch the ship pier.
in addition, two detection report shows, sinking under the cap is complete, if it is really the ship hit the bridge collapsed, and cap the impact force of up to 1000 tons of the giant, the cap can not in good condition.
on the
technical informationappellee lawyer said unclear related technical data of Jiujiang bridge owners have no bridge, take to the owners after verification to reply, but he thinks at the same time, in accordance with the "who advocate who burden" principle, the owner has no obligation to provide relevant information.
appellate lawyer that the agent, relevant technical data in the hands of the owners must have a bridge. According to the "G325" on the Jiujiang bridge collapse accident "assessment report", Guangdong Province Peoples Insurance Company of Cheap Beanies China branch committee
相关的主题文章:
没有评论:
发表评论